In this writ petition, the High Court observed that the cause of action had expired due to the passage of time, leading to the disposal of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4433 OF 2003
SUBHASH RAMCHANDRA HAUDGE & ORS VERSUS
HIND SEVA MANDAL AHMEDNAGAR & ORS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S R Barlinge AGP for Respondents: Mr. U. S Mote Advocate for Respondent 4 : Mr. S.T.Shelke
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: January 22, 2015
PER COURT :-
Due to passage of time, the cause of action for this Writ Petition has expired. Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. )
aaa/-
SUBHASH RAMCHANDRA HAUDGE & ORS
HIND SEVA MANDAL AHMEDNAGAR & ORS
A.V. NIRGUDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
