Disposed

Rinke Samir Saran @ Rinke Jatin Khanna v. Anita Advani and Anr.

Bombay HC19 Mar 2015WP/4228/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in criminal appellate jurisdiction, addressed three writ petitions. The court quashed proceedings against one petitioner who no longer pressed relief against the remaining respondents. The hearing for the other petitions was adjourned to April 8, 2015.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings pending in the court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra against petitioner in Writ Petition No. 4228 of 2012 are hereby quashed.

Rinke Samir Saran @ Rinke Jatin Khanna Vs Anita… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

.. 1 .. 1-wp-4196-4197-4228.2012.sxw

¶2

hvn

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY . CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 4196 OF 2012

¶5

Mrs. Dimple Jatin Khanna and anr. … Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

Anita Advani and anr.

¶8

… Respondents

¶9

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4197 OF 2012

¶10

Rajiv Hari Om Bhatia @ Akshay Kumar

¶11

… Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

Anita Advani and anr.

¶14

… Respondents

¶15

AND

¶16

WRIT PETITION NO. 4228 OF 2012

¶17

Rinke Samir Saran

¶18

… Petitioner

¶19

Versus Anita Advani & Anr. … Respondents

¶20

Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr. Advocate i/by M/s. I.C. Legal for petitioners in Petition No. 4196 of 2012.

¶21

Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Sr. Advocate i/by M/s. I.C. Legal for petitioner in Petition No. 4197 of 2012.

¶22

Mr. Abad Ponda i/by M/s. I.C. Legal for petitioner in Petition No. 4228 of 2012.

¶23

Mrs. Mrunalini Deshmukh along with Smt. Seema Sarnik and Kanupriya Kejriwal i/buy M/s. Ranjit & Co. for respondents in all petitions.

¶24

CORAM : M.L. TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : MARCH 19, 2015

¶25

1-wp-4196-4197-4228.2012.sxw

¶26

.. 2 ..

¶27

P.C.

¶28

Heard Mr. Shirish Gupte for the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 4196 of 2012, Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani for petitioners in Writ Petition No. 4197 of 2012, Mr. Ponda on behalf of petitioner in Writ Petition No. 4228 of 2012 and Mrs. Mrunalini Deshmukh, learned counsel for the respondents in all the petitions.,

¶29

Learned senior counsel Mr. Gupte and Mr. Jethmalani have submitted that they have to argue some issues which are left out and could not be argued on the earlier dates. At the same time, Mrs. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the respondents has also not completed her arguments. In view thereof, petitions will have to be adjourned.

¶30

However, it may be mentioned herein that the learned advocate for respondent no. 1/original complainant Mrs. Deshmukh has submitted that she does not press any relief as against the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 4228 of 2012 i.e. Rinke Samir Saran @ Rinke Jatin Khanna. As such the proceedings pending in the court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra against the said petitioner will have to be quashed.

¶31

The proceedings against petitioner Mrs. Rinke Samir Saran @ Rinke Jatin Khanna are hereby quashed. The hearing of the petitions of other petitions is adjourned to 8^th April, 2015, first on board.

¶32

(JUDGE)

Rinke Samir Saran @ Rinke Jatin Khanna v. Anita Advani and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinke Samir Saran @ Rinke Jatin Khanna v. Anita Advani and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagannath Shrihari Kadam Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mrs. Carmel Peter Prabhu . Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. .

Dr. Jayesh Arjun Katira Vs the State of Maharashtra

Artiskinky Motion Pictures Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Gangasagar Nimraj Dev Vs the State of Maharashtra

Pramodkumar D. Pramanik and Ors. Vs the Regional Passport Officer and Anr.