Petitioner applied for leave to withdraw a writing petition as an FIR was registered against certain respondents. The High Court granted leave for withdrawal and dismissed the petition on that basis.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition;petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp4109-14
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4109 OF 2014
Mangesh Saudagar Naik V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr.Suresh Dubey for the petitioner. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh,A.P.P. for the respondents.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ.
DATED : 20TH AUGUST, 2015
P.C. :-
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that an F.I.R. in pursuance to the complaint filed by the petitioner has already been registered against respondent Nos.4 to 7. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(V.L.ACHLIYA, J.) ( RANJIT MORE, J.)
Mangesh Saudagar Naik
State of Maharashtra
Respondents (other)
V L Achliya
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
