High Court dismissed two writ petitions where petitioners failed to appear on hearing dates, ruling they were not interested in prosecuting the matters. Rule was discharged with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
923
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3788 OF 2004
SHANKAR JADHAV VERSUS STATE OF MAHA & ORS WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 3809 OF 2004
BHIVSAN DHANDAR VERSUS STATE OF MAHA & ORS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. V S Bochare and Mr. S P Pathrikar AGP for Respondents: Mr. Y. M. Kshirsagar Advocate for Respondent No.2: Mr. R. J. Nirmal
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & V. L. ACHLIYA , JJ. DATE : 13th February, 2015
PER COURT :
The matter was called out on 6th February, 2015. On the said date none appeared for the petitioners. The matter was adjourned to 13th February, 2015. Today also, when the matter is called out, none appears for the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petitions. The writ petitions, as such, dismissed. Rule discharged. No costs.
(V. L. ACHLIYA, J.) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. )
JPC
1/1
SHANKAR JADHAV
BHIVSAN DHANDAR
STATE OF MAHA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
V. L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
