respondent/husband for directing the petitioner/wife to pay Rs.10,000/- per month towards maintenance. These two Applications were disposed of by reasoned order on 15th July, 2014. Application Exh. 25 filed by the respondent/husband was rejected and Application Exh. 5 filed by the petitioner/wife for maintenance was partly allowed. On 16th July, 2014, the respondent/husband filed pursis that though the order is passed deciding the Application for maintenance, no arguments were advanced by the respondent/husband and as no opportunity was given to him or to his lawyer to make submissions on the point of maintenance, the said order be reviewed and set aside. On the said pursis, the learned Judge who passed the order on 15th July, 2014 directed the other side to file say. The say was filed specifically denying the contention that no opportunity was given to the parties to make submissions. Thereafter, the learned Judge was transferred and other Judge took over the charge of the said Court and the petition, being in the nature of Review Application, heard the parties and perused the roznama. As there were some entries in the roznama, the learned Judge formed an opinion that no arguments were heard on Exhibits 5 and 25 and therefore the respondent should be given an opportunity of hearing. Hence, the Review Application was allowed and both the Applications Exhibit 5 and 25 are kept for hearing.
