The High Court at Aurangabad granted liberty to withdraw a criminal writ petition while ensuring the petitioner could continue cross-examination and receive a fair trial before the trial court.
Liberty granted to withdraw the petition; petitioner permitted to continue cross-examination of PW 3.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) Cri. W.P. No. 354 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Criminal Writ Petition No. 354 of 2015
Sanjay Kashinath Wakade, Age : 42 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. At post Balsur, Omerga, Taluka : Omerga, District : Osmanabad. .. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through the Investigating Officer, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Osmanabad. .. Respondent.
Mr. P.V. Barde, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. S.D. Kaldate, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent - State.
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.
DATE : 20TH MARCH 2015
PER COURT :
(2) Cri. W.P. No. 354 of 2015
( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV )
JUDGE
puranik / CRIWP354.15
Sanjay Kashinath Wakade
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
