The writ petition filed by M/s Marathe Engineering Industry against the Collector of Central Excise was disposed of as infructuous due to subsequent developments established by the learned counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
201-WP-3431-94.doc
1
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 3431 OF 1994.
M/s Marathe Engineering Industry. }Petitioner.
Vs
Collector of Central Excise & others
}Respodnents.
Mr A.M. Kulkarni, for the petitioner.
Mr Ajay D. Magdum h/f Mr S.S. Patwardhan for Respondent No.4. Mr A.S.Rao and Mr S.D.Bhosale for the Union of India.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & S.P.DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2015.
P.C.
Mr Kulkarni, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner,
states that on account of subsequent development, the controversy in the writ petition is rendered infructuous. In the light of this statement made by Shri Kulkarni on instructions the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(S.P. DESHMUKH, J.) ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J )
LADDA R.S.
1 of 1
M/s Marathe Engineering Industry
Collector of Central Excise & others
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
S.P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
