Thisbench quashed an FIR registered under Sections 498A, 406, 504 and 506 IPC arising from a marital dispute since the parties settled amicably and the respondent consented to quashing.
The FIR No.642 of 2014 was quashed and set-aside as per the prayer clause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No.70
WP 3113.15
SSK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3113 OF 2015
Mr. Mahesh D. Pol, advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. M. H. Mhatre, APP for the State. Mr. P. L. Gajbhije, advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ.
DATED : 19th AUGUST, 2015.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel and learned APP appearing for the
respective parties.
Shubhada S Kadam 1/3
Sr.No.70
WP 3113.15
Shubhada S Kadam 2/3
Sr.No.70
WP 3113.15
already overburdened. In that view of the matter and in the interests of justice, the subject FIR is required to be quashed. The petition is, accordingly, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and is disposed of as such.
(V. L. ACHLIYA, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
3/3
Shubhada S Kadam
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR regarding offences under Sections 498A, 406, 504 and 506 IPC should be quashed when the dispute is settled amicably between the parties.
Whether quashing the FIR would be in the interest of justice given the personal nature of the allegations and the settlement.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
3 provisions across 3 enactments
SSK and others
State of Maharashtra
Mrs. Rashidabano Abdul Kayyum Sattar
RANJIT MORE
V. L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
