The High Court at Nagpur declined to interfere with and rejected a writ petition arising purely out of an interlocutory order, exercising no jurisdiction to intervene.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp303-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION No.303 of 2015
Bhagwansingh Baburao Ingle ( Rajput)
v.
Hon’ble Minister, Food Civil Supply and Consumer Protection Department, Mumbai and 4 others.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND Mrs. MRIDULA R. BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : JANUARY, 22nd , 2015.
Taking into consideration the fact that the petition arises purely out of an interlocutory order, we are not inclined to interfere in the writ jurisdiction. The petition is, therefore, rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
Bhagwansingh Baburao Ingle
Hon'ble Minister, Food Civil Supply and Consumer Protection Department, Mumbai
B.R. GAVAI
MRIDULA R. BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
