Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition at a premature stage. The court granted liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the petition granted; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1.2940.15 wp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2940 OF 2015
Mr. Kamal Sunder Sahani Through his constituted attorney, Mr. Santosh Sahani .....Petitioner
V/s.
Mrs. Deepika Kamal Sahani ....Respondent Nee Deepika Mahesh Thadani
Mr. Rajesh Gehani for Petitioner Mr. Shirin Merchant for respondent Mrs. G. P. Mulekar APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 28, 2015.
PC :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions fairly submits that the petition has been filed at a premature stage and therefore, seeks liberty to withdraw the petition.
contentions are kept open. Petitioner is at liberty to file a petition at an
appropriate stage. Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)
ism
2 1.2940.15 wp
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order.
ism
Kamal Sunder Sahani
Deepika Kamal Sahani
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
