The bench directed the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai to decide the petitioner's representation within six weeks, thereafter disposing of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2822 OF 2015
Smt. Shameem Alam Khan. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents.
Mr. P. N. Wagh for the Petitioner. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, learned APP for the State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. Date : November 16, 2015 .
P. C. :
[V. L. ACHLIYA, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
Smt. Shameem Alam Khan
State of Maharashtra
Commissioner of Police, Mumbai
RANJIT MORE
V. L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
