Writ petition for direction to consider appointment proposals. Court directed the Respondent Education Officer to decide pending proposals within four months.
Direction to the Respondent Education Officer to decide the pending proposals for appointment within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
dgm 1
51-wp-282-15.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 282 OF 2015
Amruta Keshavrao Jadhav and ors Vs.
State of Maharashtra & anr
….Petitioners.
….Respondents.
Mr. C. G. Patil for the Petitioners. Mrs. M. S. Bane,AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATE : 19.01.2015
P.C.:-
The only prayer made by the Petitioners is for a direction to the Respondents to consider the proposal for grant of approval to the appointments of Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2.
Mrs. Bane, the learned AGP, states that if the proposals are submitted by the management on 28.08.2014 and 6.9.2014, the Education Officer would consider the same within a reasonable time.
We dispose of the writ petition by directing the Respondent-the Education officer to decide the proposals dated 28.08.2014 and 6.9.2014 as early as possible and positively within a period of four months. Order accordingly. No costs.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.) (VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Education Officer is directed to decide proposals for appointment of petitioners within a specified period.
Amruta Keshavrao Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
