IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
Petition was rejected with no interference granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mhi 1
WP-AS-2801-15.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2801 OF 2015
Lanja Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, Lanja. ... Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr.Rakesh kBhatkar,Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Aparna Vathkar, AGP,for the respondents
CORAM: B.R.GAVAI & A.S.GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 20th March, 2015.
P.C .
The election programme is set in motion. The interference at this stage would stall the election process.
(B.R.GAVAI, J.)
(A.S.GADKARI, J.)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the election process at this stage.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to raise an election dispute via writ petition.
Whether the writ petition challenging the election process warrants interference.
Lanja Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
