This order disposed of a writ petition regarding a lower appellate court's direction to decide an application prior to proceeding with an appeal, finding no need for interference.
The writ petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.08.2015
WP-2704-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2704 OF 2015
Shri. Vasant M. Risbud (Since deceased by legal heirs) Sanjay Vasant Risbud and others .. Petitioners Versus Shri. Sharad M. Risbud (Since deceased by legal heirs) Smt. Madhavi Sharad Risbud and others .. Respondents
Mr. Indrajeet R. Kulkarni, for the Petitioners. Mr. Sachin R. Pawar, for the Respondent Nos.1(a) and 1(b).
CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 28th AUGUST, 2015
P.C.
It is not necessary to interfere with the impugned order dated 27.11.2014 as the Lower Appellate Court has observed that Exh.22 will be decided at the time of the final hearing of the Appeal. The Lower Appellate Court is accordingly directed to take up the said application Exh.22 prior to proceeding with the Appeal. With the aforesaid clarification, the above Writ Petition is disposed of.
[R.M. SAVANT, J]
1 of 1
BGP .
Sanjay Vasant Risbud and others
Smt. Madhavi Sharad Risbud and others
R.M. Savant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court