Petitioner in a Criminal Writ Petition claimed that his prayed reliefs could not be granted in writ jurisdiction and directed to pursue appropriate proceedings under law. Disposed without adjudication on merits of dispute.
No relief granted; petitioner directed to pursue appropriate proceedings under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 27 OF 2015
RAHUL AMIN S/O ABDUL RAUF VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. B.V. Virdhe (appointed) APP for Respondent/State : Mrs. S.G. Chincholkar
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 9th MARCH, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Heard.
2] The reliefs prayed by petitioner cannot be granted in writ jurisdiction. Petitioner, if so advised, can prefer appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. Filing of proceedings of this petition would not be an impediment for seeking appropriate remedy and the concerned court to decide the same in accordance with law.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the reliefs prayed by the petitioner can be granted in the writ jurisdiction.
RAHUL AMIN
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
