Criminal Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. Petitioner's liberty to withdraw was considered. Petition partially dismissed as withdrawn and partially disposed of per a rule made absolute.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; Rule made absolute for the remainder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 27 OF 2014 WITH APPLN/6103/2014 IN WP/27/2014
KAILAS SHRIKISAN KULWAL AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Anand P. Bhandari. APP for Respondent/State : Mrs. M.S. Patni. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. P.P. Chavan.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 26th FEBRUARY, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.
2] At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition of petitioner No.6 - Mayur Kailas Kulwal. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn so far as petitioner No.6 is concerned.
3] For the reasons to be recorded separately, petition is disposed of in terms of prayer clause (B). Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause (B).
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
KAILAS SHRIKISAN KULWAL AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
