Ibrahim Babu Irani v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed by this court as it was rendered infructuous by the learned counsel's statement. No substantive legal points were addressed.
Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed by this court as it was rendered infructuous by the learned counsel's statement. No substantive legal points were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2596 OF 2014
Ibrahim Babu Irani. Versus
State of Maharashtra
..Petitioner.
..Respondent.
Mr. V. S. Tadke for the Petitioner.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ. Date : November 19, 2015 .
P. C. :
[V. L. ACHLIYA, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
Ibrahim Babu Irani
State of Maharashtra
RANJIT MORE
V. L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court