Petitioner challenged a certificate as bogus. Court held grievance is misconceived relying on Apex Court judgment in Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan. Petition disposed with liberty to take further steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0805wp2587.15.odt
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2587 OF 2015
(Mohd. Matin Mohd. Amin Vs. State of Maharashtra & others)
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI AND S. B. SHUKRE, JJ. : 08 MAY, 2015
Heard.
Petitioner is not in position to show locus which enables him to challenge the certificate produced by respondent No.5 as bogus.
Advocate Shri Karode attempts to demonstrate that the certificate is bogus and the Court may take suo motu cognizance.
In the light of judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan Vs. State of Maharashtra & others – AIR 2013 SC 58 , we find, the grievance is misconceived. However, with liberty to take such other steps open in law, we dispose of the petition. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
wwl
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan Vs. State of Maharashtra & othersExplained¶11
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan Vs. State of Maharashtra & others – AIR 2013 SC 58 · Who else cites this
Mohd. Matin Mohd. Amin
State of Maharashtra
others
B. P. Dharmadhikari
S. B. Shukre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
