The Writ Petition was allowed to be withdrawn by a Single Judge as the petitioner withdrew the petition, stating that it had become infructuous following orders passed by the appellate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wpl2893.2015
1/2
Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.2893 OF 2015
Khar Gymkhana .... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents
Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar alongwith Mr. Girish Kulkarni, Mr. Simil Purohit, Mr. Bharat Zaveri i/by Mr. Abhijeet Mahadeokar, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr. D.A. Nalavade, Government Pleader alongwith Mr. G.W. Mattos, Additional Government Pleader for the State of Maharashtra.
Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 8th October, 2015
P.C. :
1 Mr. Dhakephalkar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition, since the same has become infructuous in view of the orders passed by the appellate authority on the appeal preferred by the petitioner. The Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
(Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.)
2/2
Dusane
wpl2893.2015
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Order.
Khar Gymkhana
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
R.P. SondurBaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
