The High Court allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition challenging maintenance orders. The petitioner pledged to participate in time-bound disposal of an application under Section 25(2) of the DV Act.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn; merits kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 3 WP/2424/2015
Tapadia RR/B.5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINL WRIT PETITION NO. 2424 OF 2015
Javed Yousuf Memon
Petitioner.
Vs
Ms. Zainad Memon and Anr
.. Respondents
Mr.R.A.Shaikh, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.M.A.Patel, Advocate for respondent no.1 Ms. R.V.Newton, A.P.P for Respondent no.2.
CORAM : R.G.KETKAR,J. DATE : 20/08/2015
PC:
2 / 3 WP/2424/2015
respondent towards the medical expenses of daughter Sana from the date of application till further orders.
3 / 3 WP/2424/2015
submits that the petitioner is not pressing this petition if direction is given to the learned Metropolitan Magistrate to dispose of the proceedings under section 25(2) of the Act in a time bound manner.
(R.G.KETKAR, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the withdrawal of the writ petition challenging maintenance orders.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Javed Yousuf Memon
Ms. Zainad Memon
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
