The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court granted permission to withdraw and disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn, keeping all points open.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted and the petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bsb 1
WP2348.14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2348 OF 2814
Keshav Manjappa Poojari … Petitioner
v/s
The State of Maharashtra & ors. … Respondents
Mr.Anand Mishra i/by A.M. Sarogi for the petitioner.
Mr.D.A. Nalawade, Govt. Pleader for the Resp. No.1.
Ms.Shobha Ajithkumar for the Resp. No.2.
Mr.V.A. Sugdare for the Resp. No.3.
CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & SHRI C. V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATED : 23RD FEBRUARY 2015
P.C.:
Heard.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would avail appropriate remedy for seeking the relief. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in this back ground.
The permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted. The
bsb 2 WP2348.14.doc
writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. All the points raised in the petitioner are kept open.
(C. V. BHADANG, J.) ( VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
Keshav Manjappa Poojari
The State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
C. V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
