Writ petition challenging the Assistant Charity Commissioner's delay in deciding a change report. The bench declined to issue any direction due to the pendency of similar reports across the State.
No direction was issued to the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Thane;petition rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp(st)-5038.15
ash
`
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (Stamp) NO.5038 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Sushil Upadhyay i/by Shri Ashok M. Saraogi for the Petitioners. Shri V.S. Gokhale, AGP for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K.MENON, JJ DATED : 25TH FEBRUARY 2015
P.C.:
. Not on board. Taken on board.
226 of the Constitution of India is of issuing a direction to the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Thane to decide the change report filed on 31st December 2014.
fact that in all the offices of the Assistant Charity Commissioners of the State, there is a huge
2
wp(st)-5038.15
ash
pendency of the change reports. Therefore, by no stretch of imagination, priority can be given to the change report dated 31st December 2014. Hence, the Petitioner is rejected.
(A.K.MENON, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should issue a direction to the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Thane, to decide the change report filed on 31st December 2014.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Assistant Charity Commissioner, Thane
A.S. OKA
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court