The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, allowed the withdrawal of Writ Petitions Nos. 225 to 230 of 2015, granting the petitioners liberty to file fresh petitions on the Original Side of the Court.
Petitions withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions on the Original Side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sl16
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.225 OF 2015,
WRIT PETITION NO.226 OF 2015,
WRIT PETITION NO.227 OF 2015,
WRIT PETITION NO.228 OF 2015,
WRIT PETITION NO.229 OF 2015,
WRIT PETITION NO.230 OF 2015.
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Anil Chauhan i/b M/s.N.N.Vaishnawa & Co. for the
Petitioner in all the petitions
Ms M.R.Bhoir for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for respondent No.3
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.K.MENON,JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 9, 2015.
P.C.
.Not on board. Taken on board.
1The learned counsel for the
petitioner on instructions states that
instead of permitting conversion of
these petitions on the Original Side,
the petitioners may be permitted to
withdraw these petitions with liberty
to file fresh petitions. We accordingly
recall order dated 8th January 2015.
2We accordingly dispose of the
2 sl16
petitionswithlibertytothe
petitioners to file fresh petitions on
the Original Side of this Court.
(A.K.MENON,J) (A.S.OKA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petitions filed under the writ jurisdiction of this Court may be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions on the Original Side.
Petitioner
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
A.S. OKA
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court