A writ petition was disposed of as having been rendered infructuous because the Petitioner's grievance was redressed during the pendency of the petition.
None; petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP2206-17.3
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2206 OF 2014
Vishal Dnyaneshwar Sawant versus State of Maharashtra and another
...Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Ms. Pooja Thorat for the Petitioner. Mr. M.D. Naik, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & A.S. GADKARI, JJ.
P.C. :
Both the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner as well as the learned AGP appearing for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 agree that during the pendency of the petition the grievance of the Petitioner has been redressed and as such nothing survives in the Petition. The Petition is therefore disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
(B.R. Gavai, J.)
(A.S. Gadkari, J.)
Vishal Dnyaneshwar Sawant
State of Maharashtra
another
B.R. Gavai
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
