This writ petition was not maintainable as the petitioner had already preferred an appeal attaching the same challenge to the High Power Committee Authority. The petition was disposed of accordingly without delving into the substantive allegations regarding forged documents.
No relief granted as the petition was not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2172.2015
1/2
Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2172 OF 2015
Mr. Chedilal Algu Gupta
.... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents
Mr. K.R. Yadav alongwith Mr. Shrishail Sakhare, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. M.A. Sayed, AGP, for respondents no. 1, 3, 4 and 5.
Mr. Sujay Gawade i/by Shree & Co., Advocate for respondents no. 6 and 9.
Mr. Yogesh Bandal alongwith Mr. Vinod Pandey, Advocate for respondent no.7.
Mr. Lovekumar S. Sharma, Advocate for respondents no.8, 10 to 12.
Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 19th October, 2015 P.C. :
1 The dispute in this petition is related to Annexure-II prepared by the Competent Authority, respondent no.5. It is alleged that the same is based on false, forged and fabricated documents. The petitioner has already preferred an appeal to
wp2172.2015
Dusane
2/2
the High Power Committee Authority vide Application No.196 of 2012, wherein challenge to the Annexure-II is included. In the circumstance, the present petition is not maintainable. The same is accordingly disposed off.
(Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.)
Dusane
The State of Maharashtra
R.P. SondurBaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
