Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to pursue alternate remedies. The High Court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2050.14.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2050 OF 2014
Jagdish s/o Ramkanvar Mantri .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.S. Chapalgaonkar, advocate for petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the State. Mr. R.R. Chandole, advocate for respondent no. 6.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P. R. BORA, JJ. DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2015.
PER COURT :
( P. R. BORA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Jagdish s/o Ramkanvar Mantri
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
