The High Court directed the State to expeditiously decide a specific criminal appeal/revisio n within six months, if not already decided, and disposed of the writ petition.
Directed State to decide Appeal/Revision No.2009/PK/219/11-C-29.6.2009 within six months if pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp203415.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2034 OF 2015
Venkatesh s/o Ganpatrao Joynar
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.S.H.Panchal, advocate holding for Mr.S.B.Ghatol Patil, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.S.S.Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1, 4 & 5.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
P.R.BORA, JJ. DATE : 25th February, 2015
PER COURT:
This petition can be disposed of by issuing directions to Respondent No.1 to take decision on the appeal/Revision No.2009/PK/219/11-C-29.6.2009, presented by the petitioner challenging the decision rendered by Respondent No.2 on 17.05.2006 in Appeal No.13/2003, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months, if same has not yet been decided; and it is accordingly directed.
Writ Petition stands disposed of.
P.R.BORA
JUDGE
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
adb/wp203415
Venkatesh s/o Ganpatrao Joynar
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.Borde
P.R.Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
