Dismissed
Sanjay Namdev Hegade v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/2030/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-2030.14
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2030 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
None for the Petitioner. Shri H.V. Mehta and Shri Parag Vyas for Respondent No2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K MENON, JJ DATED : 7TH JANUARY 2015
P.C.:
. None appears for the Petitioner when the
Petition is called out. We have perused the earlier orders which show that the Petitioner persistently sought adjournments. The order dated 26th November 2014 makes it clear that no further adjournments will be granted to the Petitioner. As none appears for the Petitioner, we dismiss the Petition for nonprosecution.
Petitioner
Respondent No.2
A.S. OKA
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court