Dismissed
Vardhman Developers Limited v. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1889/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. 1 ..
37-wp-1889.2014.sxw
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1889 OF 2014
Vardhaman Developers Limited … Petitioner
Versus
The Municipal corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors. … Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Ms. Vandana Mahadik for respondent no. 1 B.M.C.
Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Counsel along with Ms. Geeta Shastri for respondent nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK &
SHRI C.V. BHADANG, JJ. DATED : 20th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.
On 3rd November, 2014, the writ petition was adjourned at the request of the counsel for the petitioner to 17th November, 2014. On 6th January, 2015, the writ petition was adjourned to 13th January, 2015 at the request of Mr. Tanvir Shaikh holding for Mr. J.J. Shah, the learned counsel for the petitioner. On 13th January, 2015, none appeared for the petitioner and hence, the writ petition was adjourned for today by way of last chance. None appears for the petitioner today also.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(C.V. BHADANG,J.)
(VASANTI A.NAIK, J.)
Vardhaman Developers Limited
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Vasanti A. Naik
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court