Single judge disposed of multiple petitions, a civil application, and a writ based on consent terms settled by parties. One petition was allowed to be withdrawn.
Writ petition disposed of by consent; Civil Application allowed; Withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 9468 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903.WP 1848.00.doc
ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1848 OF 2000 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3167 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4159 OF 2000 ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9468 OF 2003
Mrs.Hira Sorab Pithawalla .. Petitioner
Vs.
M.J.Kamat since deceased by his legal heirs & representative Smt.Sushila Madhusudan Kamat and others .. Respondents
And
Rajendra Bothmal Singhvi .. Invervenor/Applicant
Mr.M.V.Sawant, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.Pankaj Sutar i/b M/s. Jayakar & Partners, Advocate for Respondents. Mr.Rajendra Bothmal Singhvi, Applicant in-person.
CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. DATED : 02nd DECEMBER, 2015
P.C. :
Writ Petition No.1848 of 2000
. Heard Mr.M.V.Sawant, learned Counsel for the
petitioner, Mr.Pankaj Sutar, learned Counsel for the respondents and
Mr.Rajendra Bothmal Singhvi, applicant who appears in-person.
1/4
903.WP 1848.00.doc
2/4
903.WP 1848.00.doc
by the respective parties are accepted.
order as to costs.
Civil Application no. 3167 of 2015
By consent of the parties, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) with no order as to costs. Amendment in the main Petition shall be carried out forthwith.
Civil Application no. 4159 of 2000
In view of disposal of the main Petition, this Civil Application for production of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 does not survive and the same is disposed of accordingly.
Writ Petition No. 9468 of 2003
Heard Mr.M.V.Sawant, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Pankaj Sutar, learned Counsel for the respondents. and Mr.Rajendra Bothmal Singhvi, applicant who appears in-person. 2. Though matter pertains to Rent Act and as regular Court presiding over by Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.M.Savant has passed order 'not before me', office has listed this matter before me in view of administrative order passed by the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice.
3/4
903.WP 1848.00.doc
(R.G.KETKAR, J.)
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Hira Sorab Pithawalla
M.J. Kamat (since deceased)
Sushila Madhusudan Kamat
Rajendra Bothmal Singhvi
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
