Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 one Mr. K. P. Mali fairly accepts the said position and states that the Respondent No.1 would have no objection if the matter is remitted back to the District Deputy Registrar for a de-novo consideration of the Revision Application which can be done after application for condonation of delay and in the even the delay is condoned, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. L. S. Gaikwad has no objection to the said course of action being followed. In view thereof, the impugned order dated 19.11.2013 is quashed and set aside and the Revision Application is relegated back to the District Deputy Registrar. The Divisional Joint Registrar at the inception to consider the application for condonation of delay filed by the Respondent No.1. It is only in the event the delay is condoned that the Revision Application be taken up for hearing. The application for condonation of delay on remand to be taken up on 30.06.2015 and the same to be decided within two weeks of 30.06.2015. In the event the delay is condoned, the Revision Application to be decided latest by 30.09.2015. With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Needless to state that the contentions of the parties are kept open for being urged before the Divisional Joint Registrar. The parties to act upon a copy duly authenticated by the Court officer.
