Petitioner sought a remedy in criminal writ petition. The state admitted registration of the FIR, satisfying the petitioner's grievance. The court disposed of the petition allowing appropriate alternative redressal.
Petition disposed; petitioner free to take appropriate remedy for redressal of grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) Cri. W.P. No. 178 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Criminal Writ Petition No. 178 of 2015
Nandkumar s/o. Kacharu Gagare. .. Petitioner.
versus The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, & 11 others. .. Respondents.
Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. S.G. Karlekar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 7.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 13TH MARCH 2015
PER COURT :
(2) Cri. W.P. No. 178 of 2015
the petitioner is free to take appropriate remedy for redressal of his grievance.
( A.M. BADAR ) ( S.S. SHINDE )
JUDGE JUDGE
puranik / CRIWP178.15
Nandkumar s/o. Kacharu Gagare
The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Home Department
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
