Disposed

Shri. Sant Shiromani Sawata Mali Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. Od Education and Sports and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Feb 2015WP/1643/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bench disposed of two almost identical writ petitions by reiterating previous orders regarding salary grants to government-aided educational institutions, specifying timelines for grant release, reservation policy considerations, and procedural safeguards for school management. The direction allows liberty to apply in case of difficulty.

What did the court decide?

Previous orders concerning salary grants were reiterated, mandating specific timelines for grant release and administrative hearings.

Shri. Sant Shiromani Sawata Mali Shikshan Prasarak… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

908.wp.1467.15

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 1467 OF 2015

¶4

Kai. Yashwant Baliram Patil

¶5

Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Talai and Another

¶6

..Petitioners

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The State of Maharashtra and Others

¶9

..Respondents

¶10

WITH

¶11

WRIT PETITION(ST)NO. 3823 OF 2015

¶12

Shri Sant Shiromani Sawata Mali Shikshan

¶13

Prasarak Mandal and Another

¶14

..Petitioners

¶15

Vs.

¶16

The State of Maharashtra and Others

¶17

..Respondents

¶18

Mr. Saurabh Pakale a/w Mr. S. S. Pakale i/b Avinash Belge,for the Petitioners.

¶19

Mr. A. I. Patel, A. G. P.,for the Respondent State.

¶20

CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.

¶21

DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2015.

Aswale 1/3

908.wp.1467.15

P. C.:

These writ petitions raise similar issues as were raised in Writ Petition No. 8478 of 2013 which was disposed of by our order dated 16 July 2014 read with order dated 6 August 2014. The said orders have been subsequently modified by our order passed on 7 January 2015 in Civil Application No.2367 of 2014. Following the aforesaid orders read with aforesaid modification, we dispose of these writ petitions in the same terms, that is to say in terms of the following directions/clarifications:

¶26

(i) The directions contained in para 6(iii) and (v) for releasing the salary grant under the Government Resolution dated 15 November 2011 shall not apply till the Director of Education takes a decision in the matter which shall be done within 6 weeks from today.

¶27

(ii) It is clarified that if an institution is found to be eligible to receive grant under the Government Resolution dated 15 November 2011, it shall not be denied the grant on the ground of not following the reservation policy prior to the date of making the application for the grant under the Government Resolution dated 15 November 2011.

¶28

Aswale 2/3

¶29

908.wp.1467.15

¶30

(iii) If in light of the above directions and clarifications the authorities take any tentative decision to issue a show cause notice for rejecting the application of the concerned school managements, the show cause notice shall be issued within 3 weeks from today giving an opportunity to the school managements to reply and to file documentary evidence after receipt of the show cause notice and the Director of Education shall give them personal hearing and take a decision within 3 weeks thereafter.

¶31

(iv) If no show cause notice is issued to the school management within 3 weeks from today, the authorities shall release the grant in their favour within 6 weeks from today.

¶32

(v) Liberty to apply in case of difficulty.

¶33

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶34

(B. P. COLABAWALLA , J.)

¶35

Aswale 3/3

Shri. Sant Shiromani Sawata Mali Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. Od Education and Sports and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Sant Shiromani Sawata Mali Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. Od Education and Sports and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Priyanka Developers Vs Chief Executive Officer,S.R.a. and 3 Ors.

Kusuma Bhandary Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ultratech Cement Limited

Shri. Sarjerao Ramchandra Jagtap Vs Shri. Satish Bhaurao Shinde

Shri. Sant Shiromani Sawata Mali Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. Od Education and Sports and Ors.

Kai. Yashwant Baliram Patil Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Talai through Its President and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Mangaon Gram Panchayat through Its Dy. Sarpanch Vs Vaibhav Deepak Sabale and Ors.