Criminal writ petition disposed of summarily as the First Information Report had already been registered, thereby rendering the legal remedy unnecessary.
Petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGBAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 164 OF 2015
SHRI SITARAM S/O TATAYABA HALKADE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. B.A. Dhangle APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.D. Kaldate
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: February 10, 2015
PER COURT :-
Heard.
( A.M. BADAR, J. )
( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
sga/-
SHRI SITARAM S/O TATAYABA HALKADE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
