Allowed

Jalinder Laxman Gore v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC9 Oct 2015WP/1601/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner alleged non-payment of compensation and non-declaration of award for land taken for a village tank. Following varied interim directions, the Court allowed the withdrawal of the interim deposit and directed the respondents to complete acquisition proceedings within two years.

What did the court decide?

Permitted withdrawal of interim deposit; directed completion of land acquisition proceedings including award declaration and compensation within two years.

Jalinder Laxman Gore Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

wp 1601.15.odt

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.1601 OF 2015

¶5

Jalinder Laxman Gore age: 53 years, occu: Agri R/o Village Kolhi, Tq. Vaijapur District: Aurangabad Petitioner Versus 1 The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2 The Collector, Aurangabad District: Aurangabad 3 The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Jaikwadi Project at Aurangabad 4 The Chief Executive Officer, Zillha Parishad, Aurangasbad 5 The Secretary to Government of Maharashtra, EGS Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai Respondents Mr.P.A.Kulkarni advocate for the petitioner Mr.U.S.Mote, AGP for Respondent No.1 to 3 Mrs. Rekha Ladda advocate for respondent No.4

¶6

¶7

CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ Dated : 9^th OCTOBER, 2015.

wp 1601.15.odt

{2}

ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: R.M.Borde, J)

¶12

1 Heard.

¶13

2 Rule.

¶14

3 With the consent of parties, petition is taken up for final disposal at admission stage.

¶15

4 The grievance raised by the petitioner, in the instant Petition is that, although the agricultural land belonging to the petitioner admeasuring 2 Hectors & 99 R has been taken possession of by the respondents for public purposes, neither the Award has been declared, nor amount of compensation has been paid till today. The petitioner contends that the agricultural land belonging to him situate at Safiyabadwadi admeasuring 2 hectors & 99 R is taken possession for construction of village tank in the year 2006. It is further contended that the project work of construction of tank was completed in 2011. However, in spite of repeated requests made by the petitioner, neither the acquisition proceedings were initiated, nor the amount of compensation has been paid to him. It is further stated that Notification under section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was issued on 2.1.2008. However, the proceedings were not persuaded further. As such, those have lapsed by virtue of passage of time.

¶16

{3}

¶17

wp 1601.15.odt

¶18

5 This Court, by issuing interim directions on 24.6.2015 mandated the respondents to deposit a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- in this Court and accordingly, the amount has been deposited. We direct that, the petitioner shall be permitted to withdraw the aforesaid amount deposited by respondent unconditionally. The respondents are also further directed to initiate the land acquisition proceedings forth with and complete the same proceedings including declaration of Award and payment of compensation to the petitioner on such determination, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of two years from today. The amount already paid to the petitioner shall be adjusted while making final payment under the Award which would be declared by the respondent in pursuance to the instant order.

¶19

6 Rule is accordingly made absolute.

¶20

7 There shall be no order as to costs.

¶21

8 Pending Civil Applications do not survive and stand disposed

¶22

of.

¶23

(P.R. BORA, J) (R.M.BORDE, J)

¶24

vbd

Jalinder Laxman Gore v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jalinder Laxman Gore v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagaon Education Societys Institute of Pharmacy Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Baban Tukaram Raut Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Pandharinath Yankoji Ghuge and Anothers Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sahebrao Babaji Mule Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Seema Pankaj Nikam @ Seema Asaram Thorat Vs Pankaj Pralhadrao Nikam

Seema Pankaj Nikam @ Seema Asaram Thorat Vs Pankaj Pralhadrao Nikam