The Court treated three writ petitions challenging student admission examination processes as infructuous due to the lapse of time, holding that no relief could be granted and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1546 OF 2002
SHAHAJI SAMBHAJI BAHIR
VERSUS
THE MAH. UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES & ANR.
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kalyan Patil h/f Mr. S R Barlinge Advocate for
Respondent 1 : Mr. R.N.Dhorde Senior counsel Advocate for Respondents : Mr. K.D.Bade Patil
WRIT PETITION NO. 1580 OF 2002
RAJESH DHANA SAMUDRE
VERSUS
THE MAH. UNIV. OF HEALTH SC. & ANR.
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kalyan Patil h/f Mr. S R Barlinge Advocate for Respondent 1 : Mr. K.D. Bade Patil
Advocate for Respondents : Mr. M S Kulkarni For R/2, Mr. S. Bhosale For R/3
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 1586 OF 2002
PREMSINGH ANANDSING GIRASE
VERSUS
THE MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES & ANR
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Kalyan Patil h/f S R Barlinge AGP for Respondents:
Advocate for Respondents : Mr. K.D.Bade Patil for R/1, Mr. S.Bhosale for R/3
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: January 22, 2015
PER COURT :-
These Writ Petitions pertain to petitioner’s attempt to appear for examination held for admitting the students to certain professional Course. At interim stage, no relief was given to the petitioner. With the result and due to passage of time, the cause of action for the petitions does not survive. Petitions are now infructuous.
Writ Petitions are disposed of as infructuous.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. )
aaa/-
SHAHAJI SAMBHAJI BAHIR
RAJESH DHANA SAMUDRE
PREMSINGH ANANDSING GIRASE
THE MAH. UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
A.V. NIRGUDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
