Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition against Urban Development Department; court found petition premature and granted withdrawal.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.1522/2015
Vijay s/o Wasudevrao Shende
...Versus...
State of Maharashtra, Department of Urban Development, Through its Principal Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and others
Shri A.R. Patil, Advocate for petitioner
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 24.03.2015
Heard.
We find that the petition is premature as the Corporation has not taken any action in view of the impugned communication.
Shri Patil, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE
Wadkar
Vijay s/o Wasudevrao Shende
State of Maharashtra, Department of Urban Development
VASANTI A. NAIK
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
