Court disposed of the writ petition for seeking water connection as relief was already granted in a prior order dated 28.3.2014. Petitioner advised against filing successive petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.1467.2014_11.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1467 OF 2014
Ali Hasan Khan ... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respondents
Mr.Anand Mishra i/b Ashok Saraogi for the Petitioner Ms.H.Y. Sha, AGP, for Respondent No.1 Ms.Shobha Ajitkumar for Resp. No.2
CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & SHRI C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATE: 12th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:
Heard. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the only relief sought by the petitioner is a direction to the respondent-Corporation to consider the application filed by the petitioner for water connection.
We are afraid, that the relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted as the said relief is granted in favour of the petitioner by the order dated 28.3.2014 in Writ Petition (L) No.818 of 2014. If the Corporation has not considered the application filed by the petitioner for water connection, the petitioner has other remedies. The petitioner, however, cannot file successive petitions for seeking the reliefs that stand granted.
1 / 2
wp.1467.2014_11.doc
In view of the aforesaid, the Writ Petition is disposed of with no
order as to costs.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.)
(VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
2 / 2
Ali Hasan Khan
The State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
C. V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
