Disposed

Parshuram Babaram Sawant v. Union of India, through Ministry of External Affairs and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Feb 2015WP/1310/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order notes that the Supreme Court of India has disposed of a Special Leave Petition without disturbing the judgment of this Court, reserving liberty for the petitioner. The petitioner submits that the deleted remark on the Passport Authority website and the payment of costs constitute substantial compliance, requiring no further directions.

What did the court decide?

No further directions were required to be issued.

Parshuram Babaram Sawant Vs Union of India, through… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2015)

wp1310

ssp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1310 OF 2014

¶5

Parshuram Babaram Sawant
vs.
Union of India through the
Ministry of External Affairs
and others

¶6

...Petitioner

¶7

...Respondents

¶8

Mr.Prabhakar M. Jadhav for the petitioner
Ms Jyotsna Pandhi for the respondent No.3

¶9

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
 A.K.MENON, JJ.
 DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2015

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

1Perused the order of the Apex Court dated 11th
February 2015 in Special Leave Petition No.35896 of
2014. An enquiry was conducted in terms of the
Judgment and Order dated 11th September 2014 passed
by this Court. The order of the Apex Court dated 11th
February 2015 records that after perusal of the
report of the Enquiry Officer, the Apex Court was
prima facie satisfied that no further action in the
matter was called for. Though the Apex Court has
disposed of the SLP without disturbing the Judgment
and Order dated 11th September 2014, the Apex Court
has reserved the liberty to the present petitioner
if he wants to seek further action to be taken in
the matter.

¶12

2The learned counsel for the petitioner states

¶13

2 wp1310

¶14

that the remark has been deleted by the Passport
Authority from the website. Even cost amount has
been paid. Hence, there is a substantial compliance
with the Judgment and Order dated 11th September
2014. No further directions are required to be
issued.

¶15

(A.K.MENON,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)

Parshuram Babaram Sawant v. Union of India, through Ministry of External Affairs and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parshuram Babaram Sawant v. Union of India, through Ministry of External Affairs and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Kausar Baug Co-Operative Housing Society and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary, Urban Development Dept. and Ors.

Sampatrao Balkrishna Suryavanshi Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Anr.

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited Vs Sarpanch, Grampanchayat, Nagaon and Ors.

Bipin Mohanlal Thakker and 2 Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Bruhanmumbai and 3 Ors.

Manubhai Paragji Vashi Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

R. v. Construction Vs Nashik Municipal Corporation and Ors.