Disposed

Shaikh Imran Latif and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Feb 2015WP/1204/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners, employed as Cooks and Kamathis in Ashram schools, sought regularisation without result. The two-judge Bench disposed of the writ petitions without expressing an opinion on merits, directing petitioners to file a fresh representation for reconsideration.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to file fresh representation within three weeks; respondents to decide within six weeks.

Shaikh Imran Latif and Ors. Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

1/2 wp1203.151204.sxw

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 1203 OF 2015

¶4

Mali Anusaya Baban & ors. V/s.	...	Petitioners
The State of Maharashtra & ors.	...	Respondents

¶5

WITH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 1204 OF 2015

¶7

Shaikh Imran Latif & ors. ... Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents

¶8

Mr. Mayur G. Deokate for the petitioners. Mr. P.G. Sawant, GP for the State.

¶9

CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.S. GADKARI, JJ . 23^rd February, 2015.

¶10

P.C.

¶11

The petitioners claim to be working as 'Cook and Kamathi' in various Ashram schools run by the respondents. They had filed representation in the year 2012 for their regularisation which according to learned Counsel is not considered so far.

¶12

2/2 wp1203.151204.sxw

¶13

Without expressing any opinion on merits, we direct that petitioners may file afresh representation addressed to the concerned authority within three weeks from today. In case such a representation is received, we direct the respondents to pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with record and policy of the Government and communicate the decision to the petitioners within further six weeks from the date of receipt of representation.

¶14

With these directions and observations, both Writ Petitions are disposed of.

¶15

(A.S. GADKARI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)

¶16

L.S. Panjwani, P.S.

Shaikh Imran Latif and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaikh Imran Latif and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Amol Ashok Vengurlekar and Ors. Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.

B.B. Sirpor Vs Chief Security Commissioner and Ors.

Deelip Purushottam Rajurkar Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Egs and Water Conservation and Ors.

Mali Anusaya Baban and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Yashwant Devsing Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra through Tahsildar and Ors.

Shri. Ranjankumar Shankarrao Taware Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.