In this writ petition, the High Court directed the Appellate Authority to hear and decide the Petitioner's appeal against a premises licence suspension within 8 weeks and stayed the impugned order pending such disposal.
Stayed the impugned order suspending the licence pending the decision of the appeal within 8 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k
1/2
914 wpl 1434.15 os.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1434 OF 2015
Shankar Vitthal Shetty ….. Petitioner
V/s
The Deputy Commissioner of Police (HQ 1) & Anr. ….. Respondents
Mrs. Veena B. Thadhani for Petitioner. Mr. J.S. Saluja, AGP for Respondents.
CORAM : A.A. SAYED, J. DATED : 8 MAY 2015
P.C.
numbered within one week from today. The statement is accepted.
1/2
k
2/2
914 wpl 1434.15 os.doc
O R D E R
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
katkam
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order suspending the Petitioner's Premises Licence for 90 days be stayed pending the decision of the Appeal.
Shankar Vitthal Shetty
The Deputy Commissioner of Police (HQ 1) & Anr.
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
