Petitioner sought expedited disposal of a civil suit involving numerous defendants due to advanced age. High Court accepted counsel's statement on contesting party count and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-11404-14-(38)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11404 OF 2014
Vipinchandra Chimanlal Sanghavi Vs. Dashrath Ganu Mungase & ors
..Petitioner
..Respondents
Mr. V. R. Chavan a/w Ms Sheetal Thakur for the Petitioner
CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATE : 17th OCTOBER, 2015
P.C.
1 The only relief sought in the above petition is an expeditious disposal of the Special Civil Suit No.1941 of 2007. The said relief is sought on the ground that the Plaintiff No.1 is more than 71 years of age. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that though there are 315 Defendants, either a no Written Statement or an exparte order has been passed against the Defendant Nos.1 to 313 and therefore the contesting Defendants are only the Defendant Nos.314 and 315. Hence accepting the statement made by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the hearing of the Suit is expedited.
2 With the aforesaid directions the Writ Petition is disposed of.
[R.M.SAVANT, J]
1 of 1
mmj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for expeditious disposal of the suit due to petitioner's advanced age should be allowed.
Vipinchandra Chimanlal Sanghavi
Dashrath Ganu Mungase & ors
R. M. Savant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
