Petitioners sought leave to withdraw a Writ Petition, which was granted by the Bombay High Court bench at Aurangabad, leading to the disposal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
919 WRIT PETITION NO. 11191/2015
SUREKHA SANJIV JADHAV AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners :Mr. V.D. Hon, Sr. Advocate i/b Mr. Sawant Amol S. AGP for Respondents: Mr. A.R. Borulkar Advocate for Respondents No.2 & 3 :Mr. A.R. Borkar
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. Date: December 01, 2015
PER COURT :-
1 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition, with liberty to avail of remedies available under law.
( A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
Sureshraj Sanjiv and Others
The State of Maharashtra and Others
R. M. Borde
A. I. S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
