Disposed

Managing Committee, Alam Nawaz Jung Education Society, Jalna v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC9 Feb 2015WP/1119/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order rejected a writ petition seeking to vacate the appointment of an Administrator. The Court held that management disputes between the parties remained unresolved and dismissed the plea to review the Administrator's performance, directing the petitioner to pursue complaints with the Deputy Director of Education.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition rejected. Petitioner directed to pursue complaints against the Administrator with the Deputy Director of Education.

Managing Committee, Alam Nawaz Jung Education… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

{1}

¶2

wp 1119.15.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.1119 OF 2015

¶5

Managing Committee, Alam Nawaz Jung Education Society, Jalna Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & others

¶8

Respondents

¶9

Mr. Shripad S. Kulkarni advocate for the petitioner Mr. P.P.More, AGP for Respondent State Mr. C.V. Thombre advocate for respondent No.6

¶10

P.R. BORA, JJ Dated : 9^th February, 2015.

¶11

PER COURT :-

¶12

1 The petitioner is praying for vacating the order of appointment of Administrator to administer the affairs of the educational institution issued by the Director of Education in pursuance to the order issued by this Court in Writ Petition (Stamp)No.30460 of 2011) on 29.11.2011.

¶13

2 The petitioner is not in a position to satisfy us that the disputes between the parties in respect of their entitlement to exercise control over the management of the trust are resolved. Though the petitioner contends that, the elections of the trust are conducted in accordance with the directions issued by office of

¶14

{2} wp 1119.15.odt

¶15

Charity Organization, the change report submitted by the petitioner post such election is objected to by the other side and as such it cannot be accepted that the disputes in the management of the trust have been resolved. In this view of the matter, the request made by the petitioner in the instant petition does not deserve consideration

¶16

3 The petitioner contends that the Administrator, who is an employee of the Education Department, is not looking after the management of the education institution properly and that he has tendered certain complaints with the Deputy Director of Education and those are not attended.

¶17

4 It would be open for the petitioner to pursue complaints tendered by him to the Deputy Director of Education. The Deputy Director of Education shall look in to the complaints and may take appropriate action or issue suitable directions if deemed necessary.

¶18

5 Writ petition stands rejected.

¶19

vbd

Managing Committee, Alam Nawaz Jung Education Society, Jalna v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Managing Committee, Alam Nawaz Jung Education Society, Jalna v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary (Co Operation), Co. Operation, Mumbai Vs Vijendra Vishwanathrao Chavan and Others

Chandar Bapu Kotwad Died through L.Rs. Jijabai Chandar Kotwad and Others Vs the M.I.D.C. through Regional Officer Latur and Others

Sanjay Shivaji Jaripatake and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Gangakhed Sugar and Energy Ltd, Parbhani Vs the Government of India, New Delhi and Others

Sakharbai Haribhau Shelke, Lrs Sanjivani Dashrath Mhabre and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vitthal Shrirang Kothule and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others