In this writ petition, the court disposed of the matter without hearing on the basis of a statement by the respondent's counsel confirming work is on acquired land only, rendering further hearing unnecessary.
Petition disposed of without hearing on the basis of respondent's statement regarding land acquisition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp1062-15
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1062 OF 2015
Ramakant Sitaram Raokar & Anr.
..Petitioners.
V/s.
Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.Sandeep Madhukar Phathak for the petitioners. Ms. Jyostna Pandhi and Ashok R. Varma for respondent No.1. Mr.Shrikant V. Gavand for respondent No.9.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND
A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATED : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2015
P.C. :-
1. Not on board. Taken on board.
2 wp1062-15
respondent is carrying out the work of laying down the pipeline on the lands described in paragraph 1 of the petition which have not been acquired. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.9 on instructions, it is not necessary to entertain this petition and the same is accordingly disposed of by accepting the statement.
(A.K.MENON, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the work of laying down pipelines on non-acquired land justifies entertaining the writ petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramakant Sitaram Raokar & Anr.
Union of India
National Highways Authority of India
A.S. Oka
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
