A writ petition was filed by the petitioner. The petitioner's counsel sought and was granted permission to withdraw the writ petition. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.10448.2013_16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.10448 OF 2013
Shri Dilipkumar Narayan Salape ... Petitioner
Vs.
The District Vocational Education and Training Office & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr.I.M. Khairdi for the Petitioner Ms.M.S. Bane, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 Mr.R.S. Alange for Resp. Nos.4 & 5
CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & SHRI C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATE: 6th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:
Mr.Khairdi, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that in view
of the involvement of the disputed questions of facts in the instant petition,
the petitioner is desirous of filing appropriate proceedings to seek the relief. The learned Counsel therefore seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. The points raised in the petition are kept open.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.)
(VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
1 / 1
Dilipkumar Narayan Salape
District Vocational Education and Training Office
Vasanti A. Naik
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
