The Nagpur Bench disposed of a criminal writ petition without entertaining it, directing that the impugned order remain subject to the outcome of a pending civil suit filed by the petitioner.
Writ petition not entertained; order to maintain subject to result of civil suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
crwp1040.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1040/2014
(Motiram s/o Sukaji Bahekar ..vs.. Netram s/o Kusoba Kawade and anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. R. K. Borkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. A. K. Bangadkar, A.P.P. for respondent-State.
CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATE : JUNE 26, 2015.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order.
Impugned order was passed under Section 133 of the Cr.P.C. and upheld by the order passed by the revisional Court. I think there is no reason to interfere in the concurrent finding of fact. At any rate, the order was not to keep firewood on the septic tank of the respondent. The petitioner had already filed civil suit in the civil court. That being so, following order is passed.
ORDER
(i) Criminal Writ Petition No.1040/2014 is not entertained and is disposed of with a direction that the impugned order shall remain subject to the result of the civil suit.
JUDGE
kahale
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the concurrent finding of fact regarding the impugned order under Section 133 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Motiram s/o Sukaji Bahekar
Netram s/o Kusoba Kawade
A.B. Chaudhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
