The High Court dismissed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings. Finding sufficient material in the record, including the FIR and Panchanama, the court held no case existed for quashing and rejected the application.
Application for quashing of criminal proceedings rejected; trial to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) Cri. W.P. No. 101 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Criminal Writ Petition No. 101 of 2015
.. Petitioners.
versus
.. Respondents.
(2) Cri. W.P. No. 101 of 2015
Mrs. U.T. Pathan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 29TH JANUARY 2015
COURT'S ORDER (Per S.S. Shinde, J.) :
4. Accordingly, the Application is rejected.
( A.M. BADAR ) ( S.S. SHINDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
puranik / CRIWP101.15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proceedings arising out of the alleged offence against the petitioners should be quashed.
Dilip Govindrao Jadhav
Shaikh Layakh
The State of Maharashtra
Maroti Tulsi Ram Shirde
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
