Sheetal Dhruv Vora v. Hima Ameet Mehta
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit and testamentary petition disposed of on consent terms, with withdrawal of caveat and consent decrees to be drawn.
What did the court decide?
Suit and petition disposed on consent terms; decree to be drawn.
What the court decided
902-TS-14-12.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 14 OF 2012
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1176 OF 2011
Sheetal Dhruv Vora…Plaintiff
Versus
Hima Ameet Mehta…Defendant
Mr. Rahul Karnik, i/b Dwij Mahimtara, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. N. C. Parekh, i/b M/s. Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co., for the
Defendant.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:4th August 2015
PC:-
1.The suit is settled. Consent Terms are tendered. These are
signed by the Plaintiff and the Defendant. Both Parties are
personally present in Court. On instructions, learned Advocate for
the Defendant states that the Defendant unconditionally withdraws
her Caveat.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sheetal Dhruv Vora
- respondent
Hima Ameet Mehta
Coram
G.S. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court