The High Court allowed a motion by applicant counsel to correct a typographical error in the judgment.
Necessary correction be carried out in the judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
STR195-B-76.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
S.T.R. No.195-B/1976
(Jasraj Indersing Mohta .vs. The Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.S. Bombay )
--Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. B.N. Mohta, Advocate for Applicant. Mrs. Rashi Deshpande, AGP for Respondent.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. DATED : February 27, 2015.
The learned counsel for the applicant has moved for speaking to minutes for correcting typographical error in the judgment. There appears to be a typographical error in the judgment. The motion is allowed. Necessary correction be carried out in the judgment.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Jasraj Indersing Mohta
The Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.S. Bombay
B.R. Gavai
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
